GCSE English Language Paper 2 Question 5: Viewpoint writing
AQA GCSE English Language Paper 2 Question 5 is worth 40 marks: you write to argue, persuade or advise in a set form for a set audience, in about 45 minutes.
Quick answer
- What it asks
- Write to argue, persuade or advise in a set form for a set audience (AO5 + AO6).
- Marks
- 40 marks
- Recommended time
- about 45 minutes
Assessment objectives
AO524 marks
Communicate clearly and imaginatively; organise ideas; match tone, style and register to purpose, form and audience (24 marks).
AO616 marks
Use ambitious vocabulary and varied sentences with accurate spelling and punctuation (16 marks).
Step-by-step method
- 1
Lock form, audience and purpose
Before planning, name the three controls on the task: form (article, letter, speech, essay), audience, and purpose (argue, persuade, advise). Every sentence should serve those three. Misreading the form is one of the costliest errors on this question.
- 2
Open with a hook and a clear thesis
Declare your viewpoint within the first paragraph. Use a bold claim, a short anecdote or a plausible statistic, then state your position in one clean sentence. Fence-sitting caps AO5.
- 3
Develop three arguments with technique
Give each argument a full paragraph with evidence and one or two rhetorical devices (tricolon, direct address, anaphora, rhetorical question). Connect paragraphs with discourse markers so the piece has shape.
- 4
Rebut a counter-argument briefly
Acknowledge the other side in one paragraph, then dismiss it firmly. Do not give equal space — your viewpoint must stay dominant.
- 5
Close with a call to action and proofread
End with a resonant appeal or clear next step, then spend three minutes on AO6: spelling, punctuation range and sentence variety in the final third of the piece.
Grade 5 and Grade 9 model answers
Homework should be banned because it makes students tired and stressed.→ Clear viewpoint early — good — but the opening is blunt rather than crafted for a broadsheet audience. In the evenings many young people already have clubs and family jobs to do. When they get home they still have to open a bag of worksheets. This is unfair.→ Short sentence for emphasis works, yet the argument needs evidence before the judgement. Teachers say homework helps revision but I think it just makes people copy answers online.→ Attempts a counter-view, but 'I think' weakens register; assert the claim with a reason instead. Schools should use lesson time better instead of sending work home. If we stopped homework, students would rest more and maybe learn better the next day.
By the time the final bell rings, the school day is not over — it has simply changed rooms.→ Hook + metaphor establishes voice and viewpoint before any listing of points. For thousands of teenagers, the kitchen table becomes another classroom, and the evening becomes another shift. Homework, we are told, builds independence. Too often it builds only exhaustion. Consider what a typical Tuesday already demands: six lessons, a rehearsal, a bus journey, and then two hours of tasks that rarely deepen understanding. A 2023 survey by a parents' association found that over half of Year 11 students regularly sacrifice sleep to finish set work.→ Plausible invented evidence supports AO5 persuasion without claiming a real AQA source. Sleep is not optional. Learning collapses without it. Supporters argue that practice at home consolidates learning.→ Counter-argument acknowledged, then narrowed — Level 4 structural control. Practice matters — but only when it is short, purposeful and matched to what the student actually needs. Endless worksheets reward compliance, not curiosity. They also widen the gap between pupils who have quiet desks and tutors, and those who share a crowded flat with younger siblings. We cannot pretend that every home is a study centre. What we can do is redesign the day: extend supervised study in school, reduce low-value tasks, and protect evenings for rest, reading chosen freely, and family life. Homework is not sacred. Outcomes are.→ Short sentences after longer periods create rhetorical punch for AO5/AO6. It is time schools measured success by what students understand — not by how late the light stays on.
Practise this question
Write your answer and get it marked against the AQA mark scheme.
Mark Paper 2 Question 5Common mistakes
- Sitting on the fence with a balanced 'on the one hand' essay instead of a committed viewpoint.
- Ignoring form conventions (no headline for an article, no sign-off for a letter, speech that never sounds spoken).
- Listing rhetorical devices instead of embedding them in developed arguments.
- Inventing wildly implausible statistics that undermine authority.
- Drifting register mid-response from formal to slang.
- Giving the counter-argument equal space and losing your own thesis.
- Treating the task like Paper 1 creative writing — this is non-fiction persuasion.
- Skipping proofreading and leaking AO6 marks in the final paragraph.
Frequently asked questions
What forms might appear in Paper 2 Question 5?
Do I need a balanced argument?
Can I invent statistics?
How is this different from Paper 1 Question 5?
How long should my answer be?
Practise this question
Write your answer and get it marked against the AQA mark scheme.
Mark Paper 2 Question 5