AI marking uses artificial intelligence to assess student work against official curriculum criteria and exam board mark schemes. It provides structured feedback including grades, strengths, areas for improvement, and examiner-style commentary.

How does ReMarkAble AI work?

Upload photos or screenshots of handwritten or typed work (JPG, PNG or WebP, up to five pages), select your subject and exam board, and ReMarkAble AI marks it against the relevant mark scheme. In a few minutes you receive a detailed assessment with marks, a predicted grade, strengths, areas for improvement and next steps, with an Assessment Objective breakdown on secondary work.

Is ReMarkAble AI free?

Yes. The free plan includes three assessments every 30 days for primary writing and maths, Curriculum for Wales writing, 11+ and GCSE. Premium adds unlimited assessments, A-Level marking and PDF exports, from £9.99 per month.

What subjects does ReMarkAble AI cover?

ReMarkAble AI covers primary writing and maths (Years 1 to 6), Curriculum for Wales writing (Reception to Year 11, in Welsh or English), 11+ creative writing, and a range of GCSE and A-Level subjects including English Language, English Literature, History, Geography, Religious Studies, Psychology and Sociology, plus AQA GCSE Biology and Physics extended answers. Coverage varies by subject and board across six exam boards (AQA, Edexcel, OCR, Eduqas, WJEC and CCEA), including WJEC GCSE for Wales, CCEA GCSE English writing and A-Level for Northern Ireland, and Pearson Edexcel International GCSE.

Does this replace the teacher?

No. ReMarkAble AI proposes a mark, a standard and feedback grounded in the mark scheme. In class marking, the teacher checks each result and can change any of it, and nothing reaches a pupil until the teacher releases it; if a teacher overrides a judgement, the AI original is kept alongside it for audit.

Can it really read my child's handwriting?

Yes — that is the point of it. Photograph the page as it is, handwritten and unedited, across up to five pages. There is no typing up and no transcribing: GCSEs, A-Levels and primary writing are still done by hand, so the work is assessed in the form it was actually produced.

How does it mark primary writing?

Primary writing is not given a GCSE grade. It is judged against the Teacher Assessment Framework for that year group — Working Towards, Expected or Greater Depth — with evidence quoted against the “pupil can” statements, plus a next step to practise. Years 1 to 6 each use their own year-group expectations.

Does it follow the DfE guidance on AI in schools?

Yes. The Department for Education publishes guidance for schools and colleges on using generative AI, and separate Generative AI product safety expectations. Those documents do not publish a numbered five-principle list; we align to both by theme. The strongest line in the guidance is that quality and content remain the responsibility of the professional who produced them — which is what teacher release enforces in class marking. Student work is never used to train AI models, and every report carries a clear AI-generation disclaimer. We publish the detail on our Using AI in Education Settings page.

Is student work kept safe?

The platform serves children from age 5 to 18 and is built for that. Work is stored against your account under UK GDPR, is never used to train AI models, and is visible only to you — or, in a school, to the staff with access to that class.

KS1 to A-Level

AI marking for handwritten work — back in a few minutes.

Photograph an exam answer, an essay or a piece of primary writing, exactly as it was written. Get marks against the real mark scheme — or the TAF standard for primary writing — with the lines that earned them quoted, and one next step to work on.

Mark a piece free See a marked example

Marking a whole class? See it for schools

For students, parents, tutors and teachers. Free to start, no card required.

GCSE English Language — Paper 2: Writers' viewpoints and perspectives — Q4

Grade9

15/ 16

Live marked example · AQA Response A

Strengths

You compare both sources directly and repeatedly, rather than writing about them separately.
You analyse methods with relevant terminology, such as 'semantic field', 'personifies', and 'direct address'.

Next Step

Link the two writers more explicitly within each paragraph — whereas, similarly, in contrast.

See a marked example

Live from the platform

113 days, 2 hours and 35 minutes of teacher time saved

That's 16,287 cups of tea — some might even still be hot

What the same feedback, planning and moderation would take a teacher to do by hand, at the depth ReMarkAble produces it.

How we work this out

Everything marked, planned and moderated on ReMarkAble, at how long it takes a teacher by hand:

Pieces marked with full feedback: 4,606 × 35 min (mark a piece and write the full feedback report 25–45 min, counted at the midpoint of 35 min)
Targeted lessons planned: 4 × 23 min (plan a targeted micro-lesson from the evidence 15–30 min, counted at the midpoint of 22.5 min)
Writing collections moderated: 10 × 2 h 38 min (moderate a Year 6 writing collection 45–90 min, plus write up the moderation record 60–120 min)

Each time is the midpoint of the range. A marked piece is counted once, as the full report, which already includes assessing it. Pieces include an allowance of 1,000 for work marked before our 90-day data deletion, which removed it from these totals. Days are 24-hour days. Updated every few minutes.

“It helped me improve my structure and clarity before my A-Level English exam.”

Emma — A-Level student

KS1–A-Level: One platform, every stage
6 exam boards: AQA, Edexcel, OCR, Eduqas, WJEC, CCEA — mark schemes retrieved at marking time
A few minutes: Typical wait for a full report
Real handwriting: Photographed as written — no typing up

Sound familiar?

Writing is the work that takes longest to mark — and gets the thinnest feedback.

Extended writing is still handwritten, from a Year 2 recount to an A-Level essay. It is the slowest thing in the pile, so it is the thing that gets a tick and a sentence.

The marking comes back days later

By the time the book is returned, the question has gone from the student's head — and from the teacher's evening.

The comment is “develop your analysis”

True, and unusable. Nobody can act on feedback that doesn't quote the line it is talking about.

Nobody knows where the marks went

Not the student, not the parent, and not always the next teacher — because the standard was never written down in the same language twice.

ReMarkAble AI reads the handwriting as it is, marks it against the real scheme, quotes the evidence, and names one next step — while the piece is still fresh. In a school, a teacher releases it.

Find the version built for you

The same marking engine, framed in the language you already use — Assessment Objectives, TAF standards, or just “is this any good?”

Students

See exactly where the marks went

Upload the answer you actually handwrote. Get marks against the Assessment Objectives, the lines that earned them, and what to fix before the next paper.

Mark an answer free How it works for students

Parents

Know where they stand, in plain English

Photograph a piece of writing. Get the standard — Working Towards, Expected, Greater Depth, or a GCSE grade — plus one thing to practise. No teaching qualification needed.

Mark a piece free How it works for parents

Tutors

Arrive already knowing what to teach

Set work between sessions and let the marking happen before you sit down. Start the hour on teaching the gap instead of finding it.

Mark between sessions How it works for tutors

Schools & teachers

Give the feedback without taking the evening

Mark a whole class against the same standard, keep the language consistent across the department, and hold a record of progress you can moderate from.

See it for schools

The loop

From a photo of a page to what to do next

Three steps, usually a few minutes. The same loop whether it is a Year 2 recount or an A-Level essay.

1
Photograph the page
Handwritten or typed, one page or five. No transcribing, no retyping — the work is read as it was written, in the order it was written.
2
Read the report
Marks against the paper and question, or a TAF standard for primary writing. Every judgement quotes the line it came from, so you can check it rather than trust it.
3
Teach or practise the next step
One named gap, not a list of twelve. Each piece stays in the history, so you can see whether the standard is actually moving.

See a real GCSE report, marked on the product

See it in action

From handwriting to feedback while you wait

Upload a photo of your work, pick your exam board and paper, and get a detailed assessment with grades, strengths, and next steps — usually in a few minutes. Or open a live GCSE English Language report marked on the product.

Try it free See a marked example

GCSE English Language — Paper 2: Writers' viewpoints and perspectives — Q4

Grade9

15/ 16

Live marked example · AQA Response A

Strengths

You compare both sources directly and repeatedly, rather than writing about them separately.
You analyse methods with relevant terminology, such as 'semantic field', 'personifies', and 'direct address'.
You support your points with well-chosen quotations from both texts.

Next Step

Link the two writers more explicitly within each paragraph — whereas, similarly, in contrast.

See a marked example

What you actually get back

Not a score and a smiley face. A marked piece that shows where every mark came from — and what to do next.

Fix it while it is still fresh

Feedback lands in minutes, not next week — so the student is still holding the question they got wrong.

Evidence, not adjectives

Every strength and every next step quotes the line it came from. That is the difference between feedback you can act on and feedback you can only agree with.

The actual mark scheme

AQA, Edexcel, OCR, Eduqas, WJEC and CCEA schemes are retrieved at marking time, per subject and paper. Primary writing is judged against the Teacher Assessment Framework for that year.

Written for whoever is reading

Students get marks against the Assessment Objectives. Parents get the standard in plain English. Teachers get language they can moderate from.

A record that shows movement

Each piece stays in the history with its standard and next step, so progress is something you can see rather than something you remember.

The same standard, every time

The tenth answer at 9pm is judged the same way as the first at 4pm — so progress is measured against a standard that doesn't move.

Curriculum Coverage

From first sentences to advanced essays — we support every stage of the writing journey

KS1

Year 1–2 writing judged against the KS1 TAF, with one next step a child can practise.

KS2 student practising writing assessment

KS2

Year 3–6 writing judged against the KS2 TAF — the standard, the evidence, and what to practise.

11-Plus

Prepare pupils for selective school entry with targeted writing assessment.

GCSE

Instant AI marking aligned to GCSE English Language specifications, including structure and SPaG.

A-Level

Support advanced learners with detailed feedback on structure, argument development, and critical analysis.

For schools and departments

Mark the whole class in one go. Release nothing until you agree with it.

Attach each pupil's scripts, submit once, and come back to a marked class set — every mark grounded in the real exam board mark scheme, every comment quoting the pupil's own writing. You review, override what you disagree with, and release the lot together.

ReMarkAble turns a class set of work into reviewed feedback, a live markbook and evidence-led teaching actions — while the teacher keeps control of every judgement a pupil sees.

Built against the DfE's guidance on generative AI in education settings and the separate product safety expectations. Quality and content remain the responsibility of the professional who produced them — which is exactly what teacher release enforces. See how we align with DfE guidance.

A whole class in one go

Attach each pupil's scripts against a paper and submit once. Come back to a marked class set — not a queue you have to babysit.

Moderate, then release

Approve what you agree with, override marks, grades and feedback you don't. The AI original is kept alongside yours for audit. In class marking, nothing reaches a pupil until you release it.

The markbook fills itself

Marks, grades, percentages and trends land per pupil per paper. Shared gaps are ranked across the class, with the pupils affected already grouped.

Teachers stay the final authority

The system produces a first mark grounded in the real mark scheme. You decide what a pupil sees. That is the design, not a limitation of it.

Start a 14-day school trial — no card Request a demo

Ask to see the demo school

No card required. The trial ends on its own. School licences: from £120 per month for up to 120 licensed pupils. See school pricing.

Already know your phase? Primary · Secondary · Multi-academy trusts · School pricing

Department for Education guidance

Built to the framework your school is already held to

The DfE publishes guidance for schools and colleges on using generative AI, and separate product safety expectations. We align ReMarkAble to both — and we set out, publicly and in detail, how the product meets the themes that matter for assessment.

Human in the loop
Quality and content remain the responsibility of the professional who produced them — enforced by teacher release in class marking.
Data protection
Student work is never used to train AI models.
Safety & safeguarding
Content filtering, and a human on the ReMarkAble team reviews any safeguarding concern before anything else happens.
Transparency
Every report carries a clear AI-generation disclaimer.
Accuracy & reliability
Marking retrieves the real mark scheme; evidence quotes are checked against the pupil transcript.

Read our full DfE alignment The DfE guidance itself, on GOV.UK

What Our Community Says

Hear from teachers, students, parents, and school leaders who use ReMarkAble AI every day

"Our English department used this for moderation — every script had consistent, clear feedback."

Mr Shah

Head of English

"It helped me improve my structure and clarity before my A-Level English exam."

Emma

A-Level Student

"ReMarkAble AI has transformed how we mark and feed back across the school. It's a game-changer."

Mrs Bryant

Deputy Headteacher

"The breakdown really helped my son understand what to work on. It's so clear — even for us as parents."

James R.

Parent

"I liked how it showed me where I did well and gave a new version of my story."

Liam

KS2 Pupil

"It's perfect for identifying gaps in writing early on. Our Year 1 pupils responded really positively."

Miss Green

KS1 Teacher

"Our English department used this for moderation — every script had consistent, clear feedback."

Mr Shah

Head of English

"It helped me improve my structure and clarity before my A-Level English exam."

Emma

A-Level Student

"ReMarkAble AI has transformed how we mark and feed back across the school. It's a game-changer."

Mrs Bryant

Deputy Headteacher

"The breakdown really helped my son understand what to work on. It's so clear — even for us as parents."

James R.

Parent

"I liked how it showed me where I did well and gave a new version of my story."

Liam

KS2 Pupil

"It's perfect for identifying gaps in writing early on. Our Year 1 pupils responded really positively."

Miss Green

KS1 Teacher

Swipe to see more

Mark one piece and see for yourself

Photograph a page of handwriting and read the report it comes back with. Free to start, three assessments every 30 days, no card required.

Mark a piece free See how it works

What Is AI Marking?

AI marking is the use of artificial intelligence to assess student work against curriculum criteria and return structured feedback — including grades, strengths, areas for improvement, and examiner-style commentary. Unlike generic grammar checkers, AI marking tools like ReMarkAble AI retrieve official mark schemes from exam boards such as AQA, Edexcel, OCR, Eduqas, WJEC and CCEA at marking time, and evaluate extended writing against the same criteria an examiner uses.

According to the Department for Education's 2024 Teacher Workload Survey, teachers in England spend an average of 8.7 hours per week on marking and assessment — making it the single largest non-teaching demand on their time. That figure is market context for why schools look at assessment tools; it is not a claim about how many hours ReMarkAble returns.

8.7 hrs/week

Average teacher time on marking

Source: DfE Workload Survey 2024

5.3 million

GCSE entries in England (2025)

Source: Ofqual Annual Report 2025

A few minutes

AI feedback time vs days for teacher marking

Resources & Guides

Everything you need to understand AI marking and get the most from your revision